Intelligence - Baseline
Home arrow Intelligence arrow Page 8 - "We Really Did Screw Up"



IBM Preps Carbon Transistors for Post-Silicon Era
IT Lessons from Toyota`s Fiasco
NIST Shrinks Antennas 50-fold with Metamaterials









Renew Your Subscription

  Intelligence


"We Really Did Screw Up"
By Kim S. Nash

  Table of Contents:
  1. "We Really Did Screw Up"
  2. ' Patients Wait'
  3. ' Kaiser'
  4. ' Bad Handoff No'
  5. ' Bad Handoff No'
  6. ' Fight Over Medical Records'
  7. ' No Complaint System'
  8. ' Finger'
  9. ' Technology, Finally'


Rate This Article:
Add This Article To:
"We Really Did Screw Up" - ' Finger'
( Page 8 of 9 )

-Pointing">Finger-Pointing Instead of Action

Nearly all of the organizations involved blame each other for different aspects of the transplant center's breakdown. Kaiser executives, including Northern California president Mary Ann Thode and national CEO Halvorson, say UNOS shares responsibility for Kaiser's administrative problems. At the March Commonwealth Club meeting, Halvorson said UNOS was unprepared to handle Kaiser's demands. "We said, 'What does it take to transfer people from one list to another?'" he recounted. "They gave us an estimate, we relied on that estimate, and what's interesting about that is they assumed we were talking about transferring one person. They didn't think we were going to transfer 2,000 people."

Resource Library:
Keck at UNOS agrees that he and his staff "were completely unaware" that Kaiser would be sending data on so many patients, but that Kaiser should have been clearer. If the launch of the center "had been treated as a major project, with all the players meeting and scheduling their pieces and putting processes in place to accomplish things, it wouldn't have been like it was," he says.

He adds that regulators should have audited Kaiser sooner, based on its transplant surgery record performing operations at a slower rate than other centers in the region, and twice as many wait-listed people dying as getting kidneys. "You have to wonder, how does a health care system evolve to that kind of situation?" he asks. "What are the quality-management processes going on there? Where are the accrediting bodies?"

Deborah Romero, Medicare's survey and certification manager for San Francisco, says her agency acts on patients' complaints, and they didn't have any before the stories about Kaiser broke in the media last May. "Our initial survey was triggered by the Los Angeles Times," she says. Patients, she adds, didn't seem to know where to go to complain. DMHC declined to comment. Karel, the Forrester analyst, says regulators define data and process rules, and hospitals must comply, with all parties creating "an information ecosystem." It happens in most industries. In this case, he says, "Kaiser is the care provider and in the end, they're responsible."

Next page: Technology, Finally



 
 
>>> More Intelligence Articles          >>> More By Kim S. Nash
 


Sponsored Links
  • Get Free BlackBerry® Enterprise Server Express
  • Servers that cut energy costs by 95%? Cool.
  • Simplicity is Power. Start simplifying with Citrix
  • Register for WES 2010 by March 26 and save $200.
  • FREE Sophos Encryption Tool: Encrypt, compress and share files easily.
  • CDW Healthcare offers the IT solutions you need.
  • One number. One voicemail. Sprint Mobile Integration.

     
  •  
    FEATURED SPONSORED MESSAGE

      Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2

      Building on the award-winning foundation of Windows Server 2008, R2 enables IT professionals to increase the reliability and flexibility of their server infrastructures.

      Access a trove of Microsoft resources, analyst white papers, and multimedia presentations on Windows Server 2008 R2.

      Click Here

       Brought to You By


    FEATURED SPONSORED MESSAGE

     

    LATEST STORIES


     

     


    rss graphic
           Baseline Newsletters