Infrastructure - Baseline
Home arrow Infrastructure arrow Page 2 - Moving Off FAA Mainframes: The Challenges of Transition













Renew Your Subscription

Infrastructure



Moving Off FAA Mainframes: The Challenges of Transition



By Chris Preimesberger

  Table of Contents:
  1. Moving Off FAA Mainframes: The Challenges of Transition
  2. FAA Infrastructure: Air Traffic System History
  3. FAA Infrastructure: Flight-Plan System Rot
  4. FAA Infrastructure: Anatomy of a Flight-Plan System Crash
  5. FAA Infrastructure: Progress with a New Flight System Plan
  6. FAA Infrastructure: System Integrator's View
  7. FAA Infrastructure: Security Upfront

Transitioning off of legacy systems is never easy, but it’s especially challenging if you are an agency of the U.S. government such as the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). Real progress on a next-generation system is being made, but you wouldn’t necessarily know it if you read some news headlines about FAA system failures this year. Beyond being a nuisance to airlines and travelers, experts and former employees of the FAA are calling flight-plan system failures a warning sign for peril.

Rate This Article:
Add This Article To:

Moving Off FAA Mainframes: The Challenges of Transition - FAA Infrastructure: Air Traffic System History


( Page 2 of 7 )

FAA Infrastructure: Air Traffic System History
Most localized air traffic control systems in use today were designed in the 1960s and '70s and installed throughout those years and into the '90s. Radar has been used since World War II.

Many technologies are used in air traffic control systems. Primary and secondary radar is used to enhance a controller's "situational awareness" within his assigned air space; all types of aircraft send back primary echoes of varying sizes to controllers' screens as radar energy is bounced off their skins. Transponder-equipped aircraft reply to secondary radar interrogations by giving an ID (Mode A), an altitude (Mode C) and/or a unique call sign (Mode S). Certain types of weather also may register on a radar screen.

The traffic-handling systems used at most international airports are highly proprietary. Systems engineers are tight-lipped about them in general. They work hand in hand with the flight-plan system and have many redundancies built into them.

Andy Isaksen, a computer scientist for the FAA in Atlanta, was the designer of the flight-plan system. In a 2005 NetworkWorld article, Isaksen told Deni Connor that the NADIN system's two Philips DS714/81 mainframe computers were originally manufactured in 1968 and upgraded with new processors in 1981. Since then, they have been getting increasingly harder to maintain, support and write code for, Isaksen said.

The Isaksen flight-plan network is the centerpiece of the FAA's air traffic system. Any aircraft that enters or leaves U.S. air space has to file a plan into the system. The network also serves as the sole data interchange between the United States and other nations to distribute flight plans for commercial and general aviation, as well as weather and advisory notices to pilots.

To its credit, the air traffic system probably has been running around the clock 99.9 percent of the time since the tail end of the Reagan administration. But the time has come for it to be replaced, and everybody knows it.



 
 
>>> More Infrastructure Articles          >>> More By Chris Preimesberger
 


Sponsored Links
  • Get up and running in as quickly as 30 days with BI. Learn how today.

  • FREE Securing Smartphones & Tablets for Dummies Book from Sophos
  • 5 New Technologies That Will Change Enterprise ITAdvertisement
  • Build an IT Infrastructure That Delivers the Future
     
  •  
    FEATURED SPONSORED ARTICLES

    FEATURED SPONSORED VIDEOS

     



    LATEST STORIES


     

     


    Advertisement
    rss graphic
           Baseline Newsletters