Share and Share, UnlikeBy Baselinemag | Posted 2001-12-10 Email Print
Re-Thinking HR: What Every CIO Needs to Know About Tomorrow's Workforce REGISTER >
Government agencies need to exchange information effortlessly if they hope to capture present and future terrorists. Easier said than done.
To share or not to share data? That's the question facing federal agencies (and the integrators that help automate them) in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
To guard against future attacks, agencies such as the CIA, FBI, Immigration and Naturalization Service, State Department and others need to synch their databases and share information they gather about people.
It won't be easy. "There's 200 years of politics in these cabinet agencies. And federal-to-state boundaries are an even higher hurdle," says Steve Rohleder, a managing partner at Accenture for U.S. government work.
Currently, each agency maintains a separate data fiefdom. On top of that, each agency collects different kinds of information, such as financial reports, immigration logs and telephone records, and stores them in different ways. Even records about a single person can include different spellings of the name and fields arranged in different orders.
Even so, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison is advocating a national ID-card systempowered by Oracle databasesand Sun Microsystems, Siebel Systems and a handful of other hardware and software companies want parts of any federal megadatabase projects.
But even if federal agenciesor private organizations such as banksagree to share information about potential terrorists, use of information still is subject to the federal Privacy Act, a code of fair information practices passed in 1974, notes Bruce McConnell, president of McConnell International, a Washington, D.C., consulting company.
There are also technical hurdles. Every agency seems to have a mix of new and legacy databases from different suppliers.
Synching old data sources with more-modern databases that can store everything from fingerprints to photos on federal watch lists will be tricky. The usual vendor- or user-developed database connector, which relies heavily on custom coding, is unlikely to fit the bill.
Pilot projects are in the works. The U.S. Department of Justice is promoting information sharing across state and local law-enforcement agencies through its National Integration Resource Center. The National Association of State Chief Information Officers plans a common infrastructure blueprint for sharing information between states.
But don't expect much progress for three to five years, McConnell predicts. Even devising a driver's license common to 50 states that can't be illegally copied would take that long, he says. And there would have to be a shared database to support it.
Additional Reporting by Kim Girard