Wachovia Reaps Rewards With Active Systems Monitoring - Behavioral Monitoring (
Page 2 of 2 )
The tool, Netuitive
SI from Netuitive Inc. in Reston, Va.,
is an agentless monitoring system that sits on the network watching traffic
from specific hardware or software.
Behavioral monitoring and self-learning in performance-management
tools give IT managers much greater predictability and control over application
performance, according to a Yankee Group report "Optimizing Virtual Environments Requires Self-Learning Performance Management" updated in January 2008.
The ability to adapt quickly to changes in performance and
to monitor virtual machines as well as physical servers and applications helps
IT establish benchmarks that make predictive analytics much more effective, he
says.
Netuitive SI gave solid
data on systems performance right away, and
the technology’s greatest value for Wachovia came after about two weeks of
watching and benchmarking systems under various conditions, Hirschauer explains.
"Within the first week, you're getting decent
predictive analytics," he says. "After two weeks, we saw the baseline
thresholds and algorithms get very, very accurate for us. When we add systems
to Netuitive, we look at the data, but take it with a grain of salt for the
first two weeks. After that, we take it very seriously when it predicts we'll
have a problem with something."
The product proved itself during the feasibility testing by
calling a warning on a production database that hadn't caused any performance
alerts from Wachovia's other tools for more than 30 days.
Netuitive SI issued a critical alarm after watching CPU
utilization go from 10% to close to 50%, with a coincidental rise in contact
switching, network activity and other metrics.
"The SQL calls were really slowing down, but none of
the other tools said anything; at 50% utilization, the level wasn't high enough
to trigger an alarm," Hirschauer says. "It turned out that one of our
vendors had dumped a large amount of data into the database without going
through the change-control process, and had caused a significant change in
performance.
"Customers didn't know what happened. Some saw a
slowdown, but it was not that great yet," Hirschauer says. "If this
had happened without Netuitive, we wouldn't have known it had happened; if it
happened again, we would have had some serious problems with that system."
Dynamic thresholding helps save IT managers time and effort
in responding to false alarms and inaccurate performance estimates, according
to a Meta Group report by analyst Bob Wallace, who cited research showing that
false positives make up as much as 90% of total alerts.
That volume of false alarms not only wastes time, it erodes
the credibility of any performance alarm; this "cry-wolf effect" keeps
IT managers putting out fires rather than identifying underlying performance
problems, Wallace says.
In addition to Netuitive, Wachovia uses Symantec systems
management tools, and CoreFirst
software from Optier to track business
transactions as they flow through the IT infrastructure and collectperformance
statistics on server and applications. [[[Nope. That's right. Optier does the
transaction monitoring]]]
The primary management console is BMC
Software's Patrol, which integrates and displays performance data from
other tools, including Netuitive. Netuitive is doing some custom integration for
Wachovia, but is also working on more generic integration code that will enable
BMC customers to use it without any external assistance. (BMC
and Netuitive have been bundling and integrating their tools since 2003.)
The combination is a solid, easily justified toolset,
Hirschauer says.
"If you have a performance impact on an important
system, you're doing a disservice to the business if you're not keeping up with
it and keeping it from happening," Hirschauer says. "Especially in
investment banking, customers will just pick up and move elsewhere."