Two Detroit pension funds are suing Yahoo over its rebuff of a $47.5 billion buyout offer from Microsoft, and claim that Yahoo's severance plan arrangement was a tactic devised to keep Yahoo independent. NEW YORK, June 10 (Reuters) - Shareholders suing Yahoo
Inc's (YHOO.O: Quote, Profile, Research) board of directors are seeking a trial before
the company's Aug. 1 annual meeting to challenge an employee
severance plan they contend is an obstacle to a merger with
Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O: Quote, Profile, Research).
Lawyers representing two Detroit pension funds suing the
Internet company over its rebuff of a $47.5 billion buyout
offer from software company Microsoft contend in court papers
that their litigation "is the only vehicle" for challenging the
severance plan.
The plaintiffs contend that the severance arrangement is
nothing more than a maneuver to make any takeover of Yahoo
prohibitively expensive. If billionaire Carl Icahn, who is
waging a battle for control of the Yahoo board, prevails in his
proxy fight, Yahoo could be faced with up to $2.4 billion in
potential severance payouts to workers, they argue.
Yahoo's severance plan offers enhanced benefits, cash and
accelerated vesting of stock options to any employees who are
fired or leave because their roles are diminished after a
merger or change in control of the company, the plaintiffs
say.
Yahoo has defended the plan as a way of ensuring that its
pool of talented employees, a key asset to any deal, isn't
drained by rivals ahead of an agreement.
The company is still engaged in talks with Microsoft but
Yahoo executives have described the contacts as focusing on an
alternate deal or partnership.
"A July trial on the validity of the severance plans is
imperative for Yahoo shareholders," lawyers for the funds said
in a filing on Monday with the Delaware Court of Chancery.
"The court should decide plaintiffs' challenges to the
severance plans before the next director election takes place,
and before further harm becomes irreparable," wrote the
attorneys from law firms Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann
LLP and Bouchard Margules & Friedlander.
The Delaware Court of Chancery holds trials without juries.
Many corporate disputes and merger battles are fought there.
The court's chief judge, Chancellor William Chandler III, is
presiding over the Yahoo litigation.
The plaintiffs contend that the company's sitting board is
free to reorganize Yahoo's work force as it sees fit without
fear of triggering the severance benefits. But if Icahn's board
slate prevails, the plaintiffs say, Yahoo shareholders will be
forced to fund the costly severance payouts to departing
workers.
"The imposition of potentially massive severance
obligations in a manner that discriminates between slates of
nominees raises serious questions about stockholder coercion
that should be decided before the vote takes place," the fund
attorneys argued.
A Yahoo representative was not immediately available for
comment on Tuesday. The Sunnyvale, California-based company has
said previously that it believes the lawsuit is without merit.
The lawsuit, filed by the City of Detroit's Police and Fire
Retirement System and General Retirement System, was originally
filed in February. It contends that Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang
conspired with co-founder David Filo on how to maintain Yahoo's
independence in the face of Microsoft's buyout bid because they
had a personal interest in keeping Yahoo a stand-alone
company.
Yahoo stock was down 9 cents at $26.49 in midday trading on
the Nasdaq.
(Additional reporting by Michele Gershberg, editing by Mark
Porter)
© Thomson Reuters 2008 All rights reserved