The Skinny on the Total Cost of Monitors

By Elizabeth Bennett  |  Posted 2003-02-01 Print this article Print

Weighing the pros and cons of CRTs vs. LCDs? Start with the skinny.

Most operations and technology executives are aware of the advantages LCD (liquid crystal display) flat panels have over standard CRT (cathode-ray tube) monitors. They're cheaper to ship, consume far less power, occupy less desk space and are ergonomically better for employees.

"I've heard of many companies making LCD panels their corporate standard," says Samantha Nebrich, market research analyst for San Jose-based iSuppli/Stanford Resources.

The benefits that aren't immediately realized are often overlooked, however: Flat-panels have a high resale value, sometimes up to 40% of the original cost (compared with about 10% for CRTs). They also produce less heat and are friendlier to the environment than CRTs, which contain pounds of hazardous lead. (But LCDs are not danger-free: All displays contain toxic material, and environmental legislation is very strict regarding their removal.)

Flat-panels still cost about twice as much as comparable CRTs, but prices are falling due to overproduction and increased manufacturing capacity and efficiency. In the past two years, 17-inch LCD panels have dropped 48% and are projected to fall an additional 30% by the end of 2003, says Nebrich. View the PDF -- Turn off pop-up blockers!

Is it time to make the move to flat-panel? Click here to go to our customizable worksheet to calculate your total costs of ownership.

Senior Writer
Elizabeth has been writing and reporting at Baselinesince its inaugural issue. Most recently, Liz helped Fortune 500 companies with their online strategies as a customer experience analyst at Creative Good. Prior to that, she worked in the organization practice at McKinsey & Co. She holds a B.A. from Vassar College.

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
eWeek eWeek

Have the latest technology news and resources emailed to you everyday.