Infrastructure - Baseline
Home arrow Infrastructure arrow U.S. Court Fails to Reinstate $1.5 Billion Lucent Award



Smarter Virtualization – Key Building Block for Dynamic Infrastructure
Turn Data into Results with Better Business Intelligence
Plan, Launch and Manage Your Data Centers More Efficiently









Renew Your Subscription

  Infrastructure


U.S. Court Fails to Reinstate $1.5 Billion Lucent Award
By Reuters  


Rate This Article:
Add This Article To:
A lower court jury in San Diego found in February 2007 that Microsoft had infringed two MP3 digital music patents and ordered Microsoft to pay $1.5 billion. In August 2007, U.S. District Judge Rudi Brewster disagreed with that jury, saying Microsoft had not violated one of the patents and had a license for the other one. The judge threw out the jury's award. That assessment was held up today.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Alcatel-Lucent (ALUA.PA: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) lost a fight to win back a $1.5 billion award against Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) when an appeals court ruled Thursday in favor of the software giant in a battle over patents to digitize music.

A lower court jury in San Diego found in February 2007 that Microsoft had infringed two MP3 digital music patents and ordered Microsoft to pay $1.5 billion. In August 2007, U.S. District Judge Rudi Brewster disagreed with that jury, saying Microsoft had not violated one of the patents and had a license for the other one. The judge threw out the jury's award.

On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which hears appeals in patent cases, agreed with Brewster.

"We affirm the lower court's grant of JMOL (judgment as a matter of law) based on lack of standing for one patent and based on non-infringement for the other patent," the court said in its ruling.

Resource Library:

The dispute centered on a 1989 joint development agreement between AT&T and German research organization Fraunhofer Gesellschaft.

Microsoft maintained it obtained a license for the MP3 technology from Fraunhofer for $16 million and was innocent of any infringement.

But Alcatel-Lucent argued the patent was based on work done previously by Bell Labs, now the research arm for Lucent Technologies, and could not legally be licensed by Fraunhofer to Microsoft. Lucent was spun off from AT&T in 1996 and owns Bell Labs.

MP3 is the standard digital music format, which allows audio to be compressed so it can be easily played on computers, mobile phones or digital music players.

Alcatel-Lucent said it had not yet decided on an appeal.

"We are disappointed with the Court's decision on this matter," said spokeswoman Mary Ward. "We will review our options to see what steps we should take."

(Reporting by Diane Bartz; Editing by Tim Dobbyn and Andre Grenon)

 





Discuss U.S. Court Fails to Reinstate $1.5 Billion Lucent Award
 
>>> Be the FIRST to comment on this article!
 

 
 
>>> More Infrastructure Articles          >>> More By Reuters  
 


Sponsored Links
  • up.time Easily Monitors Virtual/Physical/Cloud. Free Trial.
  • Register for WES 2010 by February 19 and save $400.
  • Learn more about EnterpriseDB @ the Postgres Center
  • FREE Sophos Encryption Tool: Encrypt, compress and share files easily.
  • CDW Healthcare offers the IT solutions you need.
  • One number. One voicemail. Sprint Mobile Integration.
  • 12 Ways to Reduce Costs with SQL Server 2008.

     
  •  
    FEATURED SPONSORED MESSAGE

    FEATURED SPONSORED MESSAGE
       

     

    LATEST STORIES


     

     


    rss graphic
           Baseline Newsletters