Safety FirstBy Baselinemag | Posted 2008-04-30 Email Print
WEBINAR: On-demand webcast
Next-Generation Applications Require the Power and Performance of Next-Generation Workstations REGISTER >
Technology and training reduce insurance rates and improve safety.
While money pales in comparison to lives lost or shattered by injury, organizations that focus on ways to reduce their workers’ compensation insurance can create the best of both worlds: a workplace that protects employees while reducing insurance rates.
Some cost reductions have already come, courtesy of the government, the economy and Mother Nature. Florida, for example, has seen its workers’ compensation rates drop for the last two years, says Maria Suarez, workers’ compensation supervisor at First Commercial, a Miami-based underwriting firm. “Last year, rates went down a bit, and this year they went down a lot—about 20 percent,” she says.
The reasons: Two hurricane-free seasons and a weakened housing market resulted in less construction work and a reduced chance of on-the-job injuries, according to Doug Snider, president and CEO of thevalleongroup, a professional employer organization in Carrollton, Texas. “It’s getting easier and cheaper to buy workers’ compensation,” he says. “There are fewer people in business and less demand for workers’ comp.”
However, while rates may be declining, the cost of an individual worker’s compensation incident is increasing, says Mark Jablonowski, an analyst at Conning Research & Consulting, a Hartford, Conn., insurance industry analysis firm that published the 2007 study “Workers’ Compensation: Getting a Handle on Severity.” “The workers’ compensation line of insurance has seen a steady decrease in frequency over the past 10 years,” Jablonowski says, “but total incurred losses are climbing and continue to be driven by severity.”
He adds that cost-of-living increases, coupled with more expensive medical and legal fees, are causing workers’ compensation-related injuries and deaths to become more expensive. This further underscores the value that all organizations should place on increasing worker safety.
Despite the increased awareness of hazards and the number of tools available to safeguard workers, more must be done, say government officials. Last May, the Occupational Safety and Health Admin-istration (OSHA) sent letters to more than 14,000 workplaces with the highest occupational injury and illness rates.
These organizations included the U.S. Postal Service, along with some health care providers, nursing homes, retailers, manufacturers and airlines. OSHA officials urged these employers to mitigate the dangers that were causing the high rates.
The letter encouraged employers to hire outside safety and health consultants, talk with insurance carriers and contact state workers’ compensation agencies for advice. Smaller companies with fewer than 250 workers can tap OSHA’s on-site consultation program, which is administered by state agencies and operated separately from OSHA’s inspection program. The free service does not levy fines, even if OSHA consultants discover safety problems.
“A high injury and illness rate is costly to employees and employers in both personal and financial terms,” wrote Assistant Labor Secretary Edwin Foulke Jr. “Our goal is to make them aware of their high injury and illness rates and to get them to focus on eliminating hazards in their workplace. To help them, OSHA offers free assistance programs to help employers better protect the safety and health of their employees.”
Companies often enjoy a reduction in comp insurance rates as a side benefit to a technology implementation that was created to meet another business need, says Neal Fischer, principal at Hershey Technologies, a La Jolla, Calif.-based company that provides content capture, document management and business-process automation solutions.
“Frequently, companies and government agencies implement imaging systems in order to improve accuracy and productivity,” Fischer says, “but they find their workers’ comp rates go down dramatically—about 40 percent—because their typists and keyboardists are not inputting data all day.
“More government agencies are also using the Internet to allow residents to complete their own paperwork via an online form. This means more typing is done by individuals, rather than by a centralized typist or data-entry person.” That approach decreases the chance for error and lowers comp rates.
Imaging solutions—which typically involve a scanner, optical character recognition software and data storage—can be relatively inexpensive, especially since the cost can be amortized over multiple departments, such as human resources and comp insurance, clerical, accounting and customer service, Fischer says.
“Anybody doing a repetitive task with their hands or arms is prone [to injury],” says Snider of thevalleongroup.
“Repetitive motion is a real and costly claim for companies with extensive keyboard, data-entry and phone positions.”
Snider provides a likely scenario: A 100-employee firm where many of the workers do intensive data entry suffers 30 claims in a year, each costing about $30,000 for surgery, rehabilitation and lost wages. At that rate ($900,000), the company could have bought several imaging systems, kept its workers healthy, improved morale and saved money, he says.
Businesses also are tapping technology to keep comprehensive records of potential workers’ compensation claims. Most construction companies, which by their nature frequently find themselves in the middle of a workers’ comp case, have stringent safety measures and documentation policies that site supervisors must comply with, says Ahmed Chilmeran, a project manager at Parsons, an engineering and construction company in Pasadena, Calif.
“In construction, one of the ways to minimize workers’ comp costs is to document what happens,” he says. “It is hard to argue if somebody says, ‘I got hit by a backhoe.’ Documentation is a way of realistically minimizing the potential for fraudulent comp claims.”
Parsons, for example, features daily inspection reports that capture information on everything that occurred on the job site each day, Chilmeran says. “That would be valuable to insurance companies because they investigate each comp incident,” he adds.