<img alt="dcsimg" id="dcsimg" width="1" height="1" src="//www.qsstats.com/dcs8krshw00000cpvecvkz0uc_4g4q/njs.gif?dcsuri=/index.php/c/a/Business-Intelligence/Mitigating-Risk-Requires-Micro-and-Macro-Views&amp;WT.js=No&amp;WT.tv=10.4.1&amp;dcssip=www.baselinemag.com&amp;WT.qs_dlk=XlXjM6Kjl12rJ1rSMLsLnQAAAAc&amp;">

Mitigating Risk Requires Micro and Macro Views

By Faisal Hoque Print this article Print

Being vigilant about business-technology risk can make all the difference in its ultimate value.

Business technology is fraught with risk. Successfully conceptualizing, implementing and deploying this technology to achieve operational excellence and strategic advantage can leave a firm vulnerable. Unless executives are vigilant about such risks and are willing to implement mitigation strategies, the ultimate value of business technology may be lost.

Risks can be classified into three broad categories: systems, sourcing and strategy. Some risks, such as systems and strategy, are predominantly intra-enterprise; others, notably sourcing, reflect inter-organizational challenges.

Following is an executive agenda for managing business-technology risk.

Step 1: Build strong partnerships between technology and users at operational, tactical and strategic levels. Provide forums for frequent interaction to raise levels of trust and understanding. Strong partnerships serve multiple risk-mitigation objectives: They promote user involvement, permit requirements to be defined in an amicable and cooperative climate, ensure that business-technology investments are aligned with business priorities and goals, and facilitate user ownership of projects.

Step 2: Educate executives, managers and other knowledge workers about the unique environment and challenges of business technology. In many enterprises, users have only a limited understanding of the complex technologies underlying information systems applications, as well as the effort required to implement complex systems.

As a result, expectations are not consistent with reality, leading to an expectation-fulfillment gap and overall dissatisfaction with the technology organization. An improved understanding of what it takes to extract value from business technology will contribute significantly to an improved technology-business relationship, thereby reducing the overall implementation risk.

Step 3: Craft a comprehensive sourcing strategy that articulates the desired mix of insourcing, domestic outsourcing and offshoring. Too often, sourcing decisions are made in an ad hoc fashion without a systemic view of the overall goals of the technology organization and the level of long-term capability necessary to meet strategic objectives.

Time and significant firm-specific learning are needed to ramp up a technology organization. An IT group that is too lean and highly outsourced may inhibit the development of strategic applications that are proprietary in nature and therefore cannot be outsourced. But an IT organization that’s too large is unlikely to deliver desired business value in the form of cost economy.

Step 4: Nurture vendor management capabilities and develop vendor management expertise that includes knowledge about location constraints, vendor performance and vendor abilities. Such capabilities will facilitate vendor selection and mitigate the multiple risks associated with both domestic and offshore outsourcing. Using pilot projects related to applications that are not mission-critical is an effective low-risk mechanism for learning about the strengths and weaknesses of offshore locations.

Step 5: Instill an investment management culture and imbue the technology organization with investment-management expertise. As with any skilled activity, business-technology investment management is both a science and an art, and must be formally learned and practiced on the job.

Poor investment management is one of the most significant risks technology organizations face. In fact, it can differentiate firms that can exploit technology for business value from those that can’t.

Step 6: Develop and institute a metrics program for articulating risk management and control objectives, and for monitoring progress against these objectives. Any business-technology management or development activity can be evaluated against information criteria such as effectiveness, efficiency, confidentiality, integrity, availability, compliance and reliability. Setting appropriate targets for these criteria—targets that are widely understood and agreed upon—will ensure that the efforts of all stakeholders are collectively geared toward managing risk.

FAISAL HOQUE is chairman and CEO of BTM Corp. BTM innovates new business models and enhances financial performance by converging business and technology with its unique products and intellectual property. © BTM Corporation

This article was originally published on 2008-05-28
Faisal Hoque, Founder, Chairman and CEO, BTM Corporation Faisal Hoque is the Founder, Chairman and CEO of the Business Technology Management Corporation. BTM Corporation innovates new business models, enhances financial performance, and improves operational efficiency at leading global corporations, government agencies, and social businesses by converging business and technology with its unique products and intellectual property (IP). A former senior executive at General Electric (GE) and other multi-nationals, Mr. Hoque is an internationally known, visionary entrepreneur and award winning thought leader. He conceived and developed Business Technology Management (BTM) to direct the social and economic growth of organizations by converging business and technology, helping transform them into "whole-brained enterprises." He is the author of "The Alignment Effect," "Winning the 3-Legged Race," and "Sustained Innovation," among other publications.
eWeek eWeek

Have the latest technology news and resources emailed to you everyday.