Microsoft Should Step Up Its Open-Source StrategyBy Baselinemag | Posted 2006-08-22 Email Print
Re-Thinking HR: What Every CIO Needs to Know About Tomorrow's Workforce
Opinion: Microsoft needs to do more than talk a good game when it comes to open source. (Microsoft Watch)It's time for Microsoft to put its software where its mouth has been.
Late last year, an individual with connections to the open-source community submitted one of Microsoft's Shared Source licenses to the OSI (Open Source Initiative) for approval as an OSI-sanctioned open-source license.
The license submitter, John Cowan, was not a Microsoft employee. At press time, we knew little about his motives. We did know, however, that Microsoft was none too pleased that it was being rushed into taking the seemingly momentous step of getting the official OSI blessing of its Microsoft Community License.
In some ways, I can't blame Microsoft for rebuffing Cowan's efforts. Would I want someone submitting a story I had written for publication in a magazine or newspaper without my prior knowledge? Or if I had developed a patentable product or service, would I take kindly to someone else seeking patent approval for iteven in my name?
Nonetheless, Microsoft's reaction to this latest development says volumes about the company's thinking, these days, about open source. Microsoft officials rarely are lashing out at open-source vendors, strategies and policies these days. Instead, Microsoft wants to be seen as a potential partner
Read the full story on eWEEK.com: Microsoft Should Step Up Its Open-Source Strategy