<img alt="dcsimg" id="dcsimg" width="1" height="1" src="//www.qsstats.com/dcs8krshw00000cpvecvkz0uc_4g4q/njs.gif?dcsuri=/index.php/business-intelligence/Voice-of-Experience-Eduard-Telders-PEMCO-Financial-Services&amp;WT.js=No&amp;WT.tv=10.4.1&amp;dcssip=www.baselinemag.com&amp;WT.qs_dlk=XYiW8wRE8Shr@f1WpOdB4wAAAAI&amp;">

Voice of Experience: Eduard Telders, PEMCO Financial Services

By Mel Duvall  |  Posted 2002-09-16 Print this article Print

The chief security officer of PEMCO reviews his 13 years on the job.

Eduard Telders

Chief Security Officer

PEMCO Financial Services

Seattle, Wash.


Manager's Profile: Telders has served in various security roles in the banking and insurance industries since 1981. When he was taking the job at PEMCO 13 years ago, he wanted responsibility for both physical and electronic security of the company, and was designated "chief security officer."

His Responsibility: All aspects of security at the bank and insurance firm, which has more than $1.5 billion in assets. The company's security compliance officer (in charge of physical security management) reports directly to Telders, along with senior information security analysts, and the company's safety and security coordinator. He, in turn, reports to the chief technology officer.

Why a chief security officer? To Telders, it makes perfect sense to have one executive responsible for physical and electronic security, especially in the financial services sector. "The basic skill sets are the same, particularly when it comes to how you investigate an incident. The only difference is, you use a different set of wrenches depending on whether it involves computers or a physical breach," he says.

The political reality: Telders believes most companies recognize that having one executive in charge of all aspects of security is the smart way to go. However, he says, there are built-in barriers that often prevent executives from taking the step. "It's not based on whether it's a good idea or not, but over who is going to be in charge."

Why cost is a factor: "Physical security is often viewed as overhead at most companies—a straight cost—so there's a constant battle for resources" between a physical security department and information systems, he says.

When one head's better than two: Because he is able to see the bigger picture, Telders believes he can set better priorities than if two functions were divided. If funding is being cut, for example, he can ensure that the most important security issue—be it physical or electronic—continues to get funded. If the departments were separated, he says it's likely the executives in charge would protect their own pet projects, rather than hand over funding to another department.

Contributing Editor
Mel Duvall is a veteran business and technology journalist, having written for a variety of daily newspapers and magazines for 17 years. Most recently he was the Business Commerce Editor for Interactive Week, and previously served as a senior business writer for The Financial Post.

eWeek eWeek

Have the latest technology news and resources emailed to you everyday.